"There's seven billion people in the world and you might be lucky enough to bump into the one person you want to spend the rest of your life with."
Otherwise known as ‘that farting corpse movie’, ‘Swiss Army
Man’ is a film that will undoubtedly inspire a lot of discussion. From its premier
at the Sundance Film Festival is prompted both walkouts and standing ovations.
By the end of the festival it had taken home the coveted Directing Award for
Daniel Scheinert and Daniel Kwan who also wrote the film and are credited as
simply ‘Daniels’. That credit alone should give you a small taste of what you
are in for.
Stranded on a desert island a young man named Hank (Paul
Dano) has his attempted suicide interrupted when a corpse (Daniel Radcliffe) is
washed ashore. There is however something quite remarkable about this corpse,
it can still talk.
‘Swiss Army Man’ is unlike anything I’ve ever seen before.
Beyond all else it’s a gleeful example of what can happen when creative minds
with no limitations, no boundaries and no perceived expectations are allowed to
do exactly what they want. What The Daniels have created is an amalgamation of
so many wondrous, bizarre and often poignant ideas that it is near impossible
to summarise them in a written review. It can be seen simply as an exercise in
eccentricity or a much deeper product that concerns itself with everything from
the most mundane aspects of life to the broadest and most complex human
emotions.
Indeed the heart of this film centres around a farting
corpse but as The Daniels said in a recent interview “The first fart will make
you laugh, the last one will make you cry”. I believe them, as the film is able
to create a world of wonderful immaturity and existential beauty that I can’t
help but be awe struck by it. The movie fluctuates in its emotional impact,
levels of maturity and its tonal value yet still retains a brilliant sense of
unison. Somehow with all these moving parts and varying aspects of imagination ‘Swiss
Army Man’ is able to remain cohesive and structurally sound. That is partly due
to how it is never trying to be anything else other than itself.
But that sense of unison is also due to the chemistry of its
two leads that underpins the movie. The bond they form is one of intimacy,
comedy and raw emotion that is established within their own little world that
only they share. Both performances are fantastic but for very different
reasons. Dano can not only project a great amount of emotional exposition
either through his physical movements and discussions with the corpse but he is
able to maintain a sense of sympathetic and unstable sensibilities throughout
the course of the movie. It never makes you forget the more disturbing
implications of hanging around with a talking corpse but nor does it let that
shroud their unique friendship.
Radcliffe’s performance is of course a very different one
but he is equally fantastic (if not even better) as the corpse nicknamed Manny.
Firstly I think it’s brilliant that Radcliffe has chosen such an experimental
and unique role off the back of his turn as the leading man of a mega franchise
like ‘Harry Potter’. But secondly, I’m equally pleased at just how good he is
here. There is a wonderful, flat curiosity to Manny as he tried to grasp how
the world works, how human nature works and how the living work. But then there
is the physicality of the role, with the subtlest of expressions and complete
lack of independent movement that make his emotional turns even more
infectious.
But the performances are only as strong as the script and
the direction. The Daniels are able to use their striking and often surreal
images and plot points with the emotion behind their script. Multiple scenes
are highly stylised but as I have said before when your style works in perfect synchronicity
with your substance then it can elevate it to unprecedented levels. The visuals
are so innovative and stunning that it is hard to believe it was made for just
$3 million.
What is even more incredible is that despite being so
bizarre and dissimilar the everything else in cinemas before, now and until the
end of time, is how ‘Swiss Army Man’ never feels pretentious or self-important.
It is content to be what it is and as a result it can be as intelligent and as
stupid as it wants to be, as poignant and as immature as it wishes, as stylised
and as truthful as a movie can be. It is a movie that has such a brilliant
clarity of vision behind it yet also leaves itself open to multiple
interpretations, you take from it what you bring to it.
Love it or hate it, ‘Swiss Army Man’ is definitely unlike
anything you have ever seen.
Result: 9/10
fandango - I went to see Swiss Army Man excited about a potentially unique movie. Unfortunately the movie does not live up to its hype. This story just feels like an attempt to have people find depth and symbolism where there is none. The continuous use of fart noises and the constant corpse boners are a slap in the face for anyone who wants to claim to have found a meaning to the story. It truly feels like the movie goes out of its way to add the most absurd elements into the mix just to show how people can make up all these "findings". Like painting cans of soup to prove a point, this movie shows how nowadays you can get away with anything as long as there are people who believe their artistic and intellectual "abilities" can justify a complete and utterly disastrous movie. There has to be a reason why the last line of the movie is "what the f**k?" and I believe that reason is just to slap your face one last time before exiting the theater.
ReplyDeleteSee more:
watch swiss army man online free
sicario putlocker
watch age of adaline online free
12 strong full movie online hd