"A lot of the time, you feel that our lives are the worst. But if you look in anyone else's closest, you wouldn't trade your shit for their shit."
I feel as I’ve spoken several times over the past few years
about first time directors and their tendency to resort to coming of age films
as their feature debut. On the surface one could assume that is simply so they
can pull from their own life experiences but that does not necessarily have to
be accurate. More than any specific story a coming of age film can represent a feeling,
a need of urgency or the burgeoning experiences from its subjects. It can also
be about a specific era, an environment one might not have been a part of but
still shaped them in some way.
In mid-1990s Los Angeles, 13 year old Stevie (Sunny Suljic)
lives with his aggressive older brother (Lucas Hedges) with whom he is
constantly fighting against, and his mother (Katherine Waterston) who tries to
broker peace between the two siblings. Stevie soon falls in with a group of
skateboarders and joins them as they roam through the city day after day,
looking for meaning or simply something to pass the time.
Jonah Hill has certainly crafted a promising introduction here,
regarding both the opening shots of ‘Mid90s’ specifically and the broader
potential his career may have. This is a film which possesses a strong level of
craftsmanship and clear intent, with its greatest feat of visual storytelling
coming in the first scene. Without even a single piece of text to inform us,
Hill instantly transports the audience to the heart of the mid-90s with a
simple layout of a teenager’s bedroom. His meticulously framed shots that mix
in pop culture iconography, stylistic flourishes and general aesthetic choices
all convey such a distinct sense of time that the film succeeds in immersing
you within its environment in the opening moments.
While as a whole ‘Mid90s’ never quite lives up to the
brilliance of those early moments, there are still plenty of brilliant touches
throughout the movie. Some of its imagery is almost poetic in its beauty, the
performances feel wonderfully authentic and Hill’s ground level view of the
subject yields some profound observation on this small stakes narrative. Ironically
‘Mid90s’ suffers from being too middling, stuck awkwardly between a more minimalistic
view of proceedings only to then hint at a broader view that it never really
follows through on.
It’s especially frustrating for a film in which the main
thematic crux is the perspective one’s own life has when contrasted with
others. While much of the focus is on the protagonist, as the movie progresses
it shifts more to the supporting characters and alludes to their own struggles.
But rather than give exposition on the other characters in a way that feels
natural to the narrative, the film just outright states each characters
backstory in a single moment. Though I can understand it serves as a rare
moment of openness for these teenagers, it also feels clunky and somewhat
forced. It builds to a relatively contrived third act conflict that ultimately
does not add much meaningful substance to the movie.
So somewhere between this minimalist story of teenage
layabout in LA and this deep drama regarding young and conflicted lives is ‘Mid90s’.
In a dissonance that affects the tone and pace of the film as well, switching
between scenes that feel lose and free with others that try to set up or
resolve a conflict of sorts. It’s the kind of film where a scene of random
house party antics with lead into severe emotional warfare, or the kind where a
character will break down in tears only for it to never be resolved or
referenced again.
But amidst those teething problems is a film of energy and
value. While the dynamic of Stevie’s group is never explored in any great
detail, it is instantly conveyed with a sense of great confidence from Hill.
His placement of the characters and his attention to the nuances of their
interactions is functional enough to tell a story on its own. He is confident enough
to let certain character details communicate a story just in their existence.
Hill lets their daily exchanges, their dialogue and the places they visits
serve as a means to endear you to the group and their routine. Much like Stevie
when you become accustomed to their activities and dynamic you feel satisfied at
being rooted within this circle of friends.
The group of skaters feel palpably real as a result of the
actors as well, with each of the young performers filling in their roles
superbly. They handle the chilled conversations and comedic banter with a sense
of infectious effortlessness, however it was then a pleasant surprise to see
how capably they each handled the more dramatic moments as well. Even if the
scenes of high conflict do feel slightly contrived in the broader narrative,
the actors in question rarely have a misstep when it comes to conveying how the
characters feel in those intense flashes. As much as I complain about the allusions
of depth that are never quite fulfilled, it would be interesting to revisit the
movie bearing each character’s history in mind and noting how the young actors bared
that in mind.
Perhaps Hill titled his film ‘Mid90s’ for the specific
reason that above all else it is about a specific time and place. It’s
atmospheric and immersive, drawing the audience into its environment and being
mostly content to observe the characters within it. The hazy streets of LA shot
with an almost dreamlike focus, scored by the iconic and varied sounds of that
decade, make for a wonderfully grounded view. I just wish it was more
frequently self-reflective than the characters occasionally are.
Well-crafted and clearly personal, ‘Mid90s’ is an imperfect
but still capably strong directorial debut.
No comments:
Post a Comment