"You gave me my first glimpse of a real life and then ask me to carry on a false one. No one can endure that."
Though an 18th century period piece would
initially appear to be a deviation from Scorsese’s usual calibre of filmmaking.
However as he has proven time and time again, he is a director that applies his
own themes and sensibilities to the subject matter at hand. His crime movies
are about codes, ways of life and honoured agreements that entrap and imprison
those who occupy them, his film about high society follows a similar pattern.
Newland Archer (Daniel Day Lewis) is planning to marry the
respectable May Welland (Winona Ryder). May's cousin, the Countess Ellen
Olenska (Michelle Pfeiffer), has returned to New York, which causes a shock in
society circles due to her unconventional views. As a result Newland becomes increasingly
disillusioned with his new fiancée May and her innocence, lack of personal
opinion, and sense of self.
So while on the surface this sounds like a standard love
triangle that any filmmaker could knock out in their sleep, Martin Scorsese
once again managed to look deeper into the themes and resonance of the script
and bring forward his own central conceits and ideologies that would evoke more
thought provoking ideas and messages from the film. Based off of the book of
the same name by Edith Wharton the film is not about reliving the trivial
dramas of socialites, it is about examining the way the characters’ lives are
dictated by the society they inhabit. How social conventions result in each one
of them having to uphold certain expectations and how that can conflict with
their own personal desires.
Just because the film lacks gunfire and gangland violence
does not make it any less brutal than Scorsese’s previous efforts. The
emotional powerhouse on display from a man’s [passion being slowly crushed to
the suppressive nature of the society he occupies. It is frequently tragic and poignant
to an almost painful extent, not only because the script is able to craft such
empathetic characters but it so fully fleshes out the world they inhabit that
their inevitable heartbreak seems to crushingly unavoidable that we are almost
disheartened that we even dared to hope that the outcome could be anything
else.
But one of the elements that makes this environment feel so
fleshed out is, as always, Scorsese’s direction. In the past he has employed
his flashier and more flamboyant techniques to reflect a characters state of
mind but here Scorsese’s camera simply observes. He takes note of the smallest
and subtlest of moments and it is through these actions and observations that
we not only perfectly understand each characters motivations without it ever
being truly explained, but also the way society around them restricts their
every inflection and gesture. Not only does that atmosphere create an
impression that hangs over the rest of the movie and establishes a clear
motivation for every decision on display, but when some passionate moments do
seep through they seem all the more daring for it.
This technique requires immense patience and one would think
that may be difficult for a director known for crafting films of such high
energy like Scorsese. But once again he is able to defy convention and move his
camera slowly through the high society. Normally he never relies on static
shots and though the camera is never still within ‘The Age of Innocence’ it
moves at such a slow pace that it gives the viewer time to soak in the rich
details of the surroundings and when he wants it to the director can plant his
camera directly into a conversation. It does not seek to alienate or separate the
viewer from the characters, instead it serves to implant it directly within
their establishment.
The performances in question are superb, as one would of
course expect from the likes of Daniel Day Lewis and Michelle Pfeiffer. Though
it’s not as explosive as the roles that would earn him a place among legends,
Day Lewis’ performance here is a restrained but effective one. He is extremely
confident as the more conflicted figure, caught between his devotion to
upholding society’s expectations and fulfilling his own desires. Pfeiffer’s
performance is one that leaves much up to interpretation, the way she cuts
through conventions and seems to take delight in seducing Newland with the
power of her opinions. The biggest surprise though could be Winona Ryder, as
the way her character’s arc is written and structured allows her to reveal
hidden depth and complexity within her performance, but she is able to convey
all of this with great conviction and is ultimately integral to the final
emotional punch that underpins the movie.
Stunningly directed and beautifully constructed as well as
emotionally riveting, ‘The Age of Innocence’ is an off kilter genre for
Scorsese but one that he can pull off with equal brilliance.
Result: 8/10
No comments:
Post a Comment