Though he will always be remembered for his cold and
impassive stare, accompanied with a voice as smooth as sandpaper that made the
man with no name so memorable in the Dollars Trilogy, Clint Eastwood has
undoubtedly built up an admirable career as a director. This biographical-musical-drama
is a step out of the ordinary for him, but then again, no great director has
built a career around the same format over and over again, so how has the
ageing icon fared with his latest release.
Make no mistake, just because this is a musical does not
mean it is all happy and upbeat. In fact the musical scenes are the only ones
that are consistently up-beat, but I mean that in a good way. It helps that it
is about a band, also they can include music despite the fact that the scenes
that do not involve music make sense when compared to them. As well as this,
there are clear elements of classic Eastwood themes. To explain quickly I’ll
describe the opening narration, where Tommy DeVito explains that if it wasn’t for
him, he and his friends would be lying in a car trunk with bullets in their
heads, rough stuff for a group of swinging sixties singers. We watch s these
four boys battle their way out of the New Jersey community to stardom, forming
the highly successful Four Seasons group, amid gambling and loan sharks.
So you should be asking yourself, what kind of film is this?
Despite my best efforts, I can’t properly explain. I can only register my own
opinion of what this film is, and in my opinion it falls in-between music and
drama. Regrettably I would struggle to refer to it as a biography, as it is
rife with historical inaccuracies and leaves out key facts, like one of the
main characters dying just ten years after the point at which the film ends, I
really was surprised not to see at least a short paragraph to state what happened
to these people next. True, it does tell the story of real people, famous ones
at that, but without a great deal of real historical context it feels a bit too
dramatized. As well as this there are a few too many clichés and true history
makes clichés irrelevant. But in this context it feels like more like a
commonly used plot point.
However, that does not make the film bad. To sum this film
up in a phrase, as ridiculous as it sounds, it’s ‘What if Martin Scorsese did a
musical?’ The story even features Joe Pesci, and the start feels remarkably
like a light hearted Goodfellas, it even has the narration to accompany it (and
serious fans of the mobster masterpiece will spot a subtle reference later in
honour of Pesci’s involvement). There are some great performances as well, Christopher
Walken delivering as he always does. As well as this the Four Seasons do feel
genuine, maybe not historically, but as characters in a film they are nicely layered.
Their friendship and eventual fallout all feel genuine, and either they are
very good actors or they genuinely are enjoying portraying this iconic band and
that makes it feel real.
The film also has a very impressive look as well. Maybe it’s
because we admire the sixties in a nostalgic nature, but the film really is a
visual feast. It’s richly coloured and (ironic for Eastwood) contains a smooth
sound. As well as the fact that the music is fun and uplifting, contrasting
well with the harsh nature of the plot, it is a welcome release of tension.
However this may hinder it slightly, on more than one occasion it jumps from
serious to singing too quickly to let the emotional impct sik in, or to enjoy
to music. It may fail to convince us that these people really existed, but it
does offer an appealing take on the slum to success story.
Result 5/10
No comments:
Post a Comment