At the end of 2014 I chose to look back and celebrate the
anniversary of the Dollars Trilogy as it turned 50 years old. I thought I would
maintain this annual tradition (a tradition of one article and counting) by
looking back on another trilogy reaching a milestone. Although to be fair, far
from being long over this trilogy only ended three years ago in 2013, having
started 20 years ago in 1995. If you hadn’t worked it out I am talking about
Richard Linklater’s Before Trilogy.
‘Before Sunrise’ (1995), ‘Before Sunset’ (2004) and ‘Before
Midnight’ (2013) chronicled the long running and tumultuous relationship between
Ethan Hawke and Julie Delpy as Jesse and Celine. In ‘Before Sunrise’ they are
thrown together by a bickering middle aged couple (foreshadowing much?) sharing
their train carriage as they each make their way back home. They spend the
night together in the Austrian Capital (not in that way!). They simply roam the
streets of Vienna, discussing life, love and loss as well as death, the city
around them, life back home, from the obscurest detail to the broadest and most
philosophical topic, they walk and talk for the rest of the night. That’s as
far as it goes plot wise, but we all know that for certain movies, the plot is
not even half the story.
The movie treats the passage of time as a looming presence
over the two of them, slowly drawing their interval together to a close. Every
time it’s referenced your heart sinks a little as even though the current
conversation is enjoyable and entertaining, there is that undeniable sense of defeat
as the Jesse and Celine must soon part ways. This is one area that Linklater
excels at as a writer, he makes you want to spend more time with his characters
and though you were happy to be given a window into their lives, you wish you
could spend more time there. In ‘Dazed and Confused’ I always find myself
wishing that the film will just continue, that I can watch the four friends go
to the Metallica concert and watch what happens upon their return to school. The
same can be said for ‘Before Sunrise’ as in a surprise ending, Jesse and Celine
really do part ways, choosing not to stay together.
If you watched that in 1995, you would have to wait until
2004 to get that wish for more time fulfilled. Nine years later the couple
reunite, which was odd, because though ‘Before Sunset’ was emotionally engaging
and ambiguous in its ending, there was really no call for a sequel, as if this
chance encounter was impactful but not significant, just one small space of
time in their lives that physically means very little. However Jesse used that
night as inspiration for a novel which makes him a renowned author, and at a
book signing in Paris, they meet again. This encounter is similar, but subtly
different. Both characters are more cynical now, contrary to feeling as if
anything was possible in 1995, they now have commitments and responsibilities.
One remarkable thing about this film, even more than the previous,
is how effortless it feels. The first was permeated with moments of awkwardness
between the two but now the conversations flow at a much faster and relaxed
rate. They know each other now, they are not strangers and that romance seems to
have been suppressed slightly. But that does not mean it does not exist. St the
same time though they do not rush into revelations, they take their time to
come to certain conclusions that we already know, why? Because real life is
rarely as spontaneous as the movies say it is, and Linklater knows that.
Another nine years pass, and we reach ‘Before Midnight’ in
2013. Jesse and Celine are now parents and wrestling with the issues of a long
term relationship. Harkening back to their first meeting eighteen years ago,
they are now that bickering middle aged couple that caused their first meeting.
There is still a sense that time is running out as they revel in the last day
of a family holiday before a return to normality. It echoes the moments of the
past as the two struggle to reconcile and never fails to feel genuine.
Though it would have been easy to romanticise this third
chapter, Linklater offers such a truthful view of this mature relationship that
you are equally enthralled once again. It feels painful whenever they argue and
sometimes depressing, because the film exploits your connection with these
characters and uses it against you whenever they argue. It could be quite
disconcerting but by retaining similar tones and themes of the previous films
it simply feels like another chapter in their story, one that is equally powerful
and seductive as every other instalment.
One last thing, I’ve celebrated a few anniversaries this
year such as ‘Heat’, ‘Back to the Future’ and ‘The Breakfast Club’. But there
are a few I didn’t get around to celebrating like the twentieth anniversary of ‘Seven’
and the thirtieth anniversary of ‘Ran’ and the fortieth anniversary of ‘Nashville’.
But above all of them, one endearing absence is Scorsese, given that 2015 marks
the 35th anniversary of ‘Raging Bull’, the 30th
anniversary of ‘After Hours and 25 years since the release of ‘Goodfellas’.
This cannot go unnoticed, but given that 2016 represents 40 years since Travis
Bickle first asked if we were talking to him in ‘Taxi Driver’, as well as the
new release of Scorsese’s long awaited passion project ‘Silence’ I think next
year is a good enough time to do a new series of reviews, going through the
director’s very best films and trying to reach an answer to the question ‘is he
the best director of all time?’. Find out next year.
No comments:
Post a Comment