"We're going to prove, once and for all, that god is dead."
When you say the title of this movie out loud it sounds more
like you’re asking a question. “God’s not dead too? Is he, really, as well? Ah
that’s a shame.” I can answer that question and say yes, he is indeed dead. Why
you may ask? Simple; God saw this film and promptly killed himself. That is
what happened. Can’t say I blame him.
Okay let’s get this over with. A teacher (played by, who
cares?) answers a student’s question relating to the teachings of Jesus in
their history class. But she soon finds herself bombarded with accusations that
she was trying to preach a Christian message in a public school (which she sort
of was but at the same time could easily disprove anyway) and faces a court
trial that could end her career.
A quick Google search defines propaganda as “information,
especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote a political cause
or point of view”. ‘God’s Not Dead 2’ is a propaganda film, plain and simple.
It’s one of the most offensive, unflattering and deluded propaganda films I’ve
ever seen. At least with the Nazi propaganda movies (whose themes are obviously
not endorsed by this blog, or anyone in a civilised society) had impressive
editing techniques, but this is on another level entirely.
I’m not a religious person but if I was I feel as if I’d be
outraged by this movie, especially if I was a Christian. It’s not about
spreading messages of peace and forgiveness, it doesn’t exist to show anyone
the benefits of religion. It exists to reinforce the prejudices and bigotries
held by its audience. What’s even more insulting is the fact that it also tries
to convince both its audience and itself that they are the ones being persecuted,
that they are living in a society that rejects them. I think the fact that the
first movie made a profit of $60 million proves that isn’t true.
But suppose we put ethics aside for a moment, because it
would be easy to tear this film apart from that standpoint, like pointing out
how every non-Christian character is villainised, how ridiculously unbalanced
it is (remembering that it’s a court movie, a genre famous for promoting both
sides of the argument) or how moronically unbalanced it is. But for now let’s
just look at how solid the plot is. So the teacher is sent to court and
immediately you have to wonder how difficult it would have been to argue that
what she said in class could not be construed as preaching. If I was a lawyer I
would state that she was simply offering the viewpoint of a certain perspective
and using it to contrast the teachings of other historical figures.
That doesn’t happen. What happens is a lengthy court case in
which the defence tries to prove that God exists. Now I admit I am in fact not
a lawyer, but that is a terrible platform from which to build your case. My client
says to me “We’ll win the case by proving all science wrong” and my response is
“No, in fact while we’re in court I’m the only person that’s allowed to speak.
Okay?” Even before that you would think a good justice system would ask for the
accused’s side of the story before taking it to court during which it would
become blatantly obvious that she was answering a question. Their defence case
is actually ridiculously weak (siting its only evidence as the Bible) but it’s
okay because she’s found not guilty when everyone prays for it. That is literal
Deus Ex Machina right there.
So after establishing that the plot defies all rules of
logic we can move onto other factors like directing, acting cinematography.
None of them exist. That concludes my review of the technical aspects of ‘God’s
Not Dead 2’. Going back to ethics this film is also pure fearmongering, at one
point a pastor states that they are “at war” with atheists. The atheists in
question all spend the movie curling their evil moustaches and plotting to take
down Christianity. Don’t worry ‘God’s Not Dead 2’ you’re doing a fine job of
that yourself.
But the worst thing by a mile is just the hypocrisy of it
all. Say, theoretically, you made a slight alteration to this film’s synopsis
so instead of preaching Christian ideals the teacher was preaching Jewish or
Muslim teachings to her class. The people who support this movie would be the first
in line to have a problem with that.
Pure propaganda, the only thing that’s more insulting is its
quality.
Result: 1/10
No comments:
Post a Comment