It’s a common misconception that debut films are always
going to be second best. Tarantino proved us wrong with creating Reservoir
Dogs, as did George Lucas with American Graffiti. They also have a good knack
of leading on to much greater things, in both of those examples the directors
went on to create some of the greatest films of all time (Tarantino directing
Pulp Fiction and Lucas directing Star Wars). So I always look forward to debuts
and second films, especially the possibilities that they open, and I found
myself in such a situation with Animal Kingdom. It was a theatrically layered
and unexpectedly good, and the debut film of David Michod.
His next film The Rover follows a man tracking down a group
of thieves in an apocalyptic Australia. This is dangerous territory, the second
film can lead to great things, but also spell disaster. This thriller has a
very minimalistic writing style to it, but this can work brilliantly if carried
out correctly. There is quite a lack of psychological and character complexity,
the plot means that there isn’t much room to expand on the initial scenario
that we see at the start of the film.
However, it manages to make up for this with some impressive
performances. The production design is very admirable as well, creating an
apocalyptic wasteland effectively and simplistically. Guy Pearce uses his usual
silent but strong persona to create a rather menacing protagonist. Admittedly
he’s not much of a relatable character, it’s understandable what this character
does but we don’t share or connect with his emotional turmoil. Robert Pattinson
offers an enjoyable performance, especially when compared to some of his
previous projects, he successfully portrays a once innocent character who is
forced to take desperate measures to ensure his survival in an
every-man-for-himself-world.
Combined with Pearce’s hard as nails character they form
quite an interesting duo. In many ways the setting of this film is more interesting
than the actual plot or characters. The economic collapse that has virtually
destroyed the world seems like an interesting idea. In many ways though, this
can be seen as a problem. All great films of this genre have had a more
interesting factor than the setup. Can anyone actually remember the cause of
the carnage in Mad Max, not really. But who cares about that? We’re treated to
some spectacular action sequences, design, characters and of course Max, who’s
mad. Sadly The Rover can’t quite match any of those elements, it’s good, but
not memorable.
However, for now the film has a very appealing nature to it.
Everything feels real and detailed, like I said before Michod has had a challenge
with this film, but he has directed it very well. The cinematography is
striking and the production of this wasteland is very effective, making good
use of the Australian landscape. I would also highly recommend the original
soundtrack, it works very well with the desolate scenes. However it lacks the
emotional depth and spectacular action (maybe it’s not meant to be an action
film but it would need to be much smarter in terms of story to pull off no
action) to make it stand out.
Result: 6/10
No comments:
Post a Comment