Daniel Radcliffe is proving to be quite an accomplished
young actor just three short years since the end of Harry Potter. Some will
argue that his success is hinged, and will always be, on his role as the boy
wizard. But I have to disagree, and this film offers a good argument for that.
Based on the play Cigars and Toothpaste this romantic comedy follows Wallace
(Radcliffe) and Chantry (Zoe Kazan) as they struggle to not become friends with
benefits and something further, as Zoe is already in a happy relationship and
Wallace does not want to force a hurtful break up.
Some of you may be thinking though, surely a slight change
in plot will struggle to make this film stand out. So many rom-coms have become
utterly forgettable and very formulaic, in some ways this one isn’t an exception.
We certainly aren’t straying from our familiar comfort zones. Take a look at
the first fifteen minutes of this film, what do you think will happen. You’re
probably right. The traditional American girl meets British boy
characterisation is here, apart from the fact that she’s Canadian.
But there are plenty of redeeming features to make up for
the rather formulaic narrative. There is a genuine and believable chemistry
between the two main stars. Radcliffe and Kazan both bounce off of each other
very well whilst clashing when they need to. The characters are given quite a
rough time of it, emotionally at least. This means that we’re always interested
in what happens and unsure what we really want for them. Although the ending
may be predictable, you’ll have to keep guessing whether it will be portrayed
as a happy or depressing fate for these people.
It also appeals very well to the mid-twenties target
audience. The fast paced humour mixed with traditional yet still very
entertaining style of humour creates a witty and smart as well as being
unusually self-conscious for a film in this genre. It reminds me of two things,
firstly this entire romantic comedy style is associated mainly with Richard
Curtis, director of Four Weddings and a Funeral, Love Actually and About Time.
He does this genre better than most and can always put a nice spin on it.
As well as the similar humour this observation leads me onto
another point. It’s also quite reminiscent of 500 Days of Summer. While I may
mock the plot slightly, like I said before while the narrative may be
predictable, the emotional impact of the film is unusually difficult to
predict. It’s feel good most of the time, as a film like this needs to be, but
it also becomes hard-hitting at the right moments. The fact that these
characters actually want to be friends purely to maintain the status quo, and
that they get along so well as friends makes you wonder if they might have
dodged a bullet. After all, as films have repeatedly taught us, Love can hurt.
It’s a welcome change of acting style for Radcliffe, proving
he is far more than a one trick pony. And with the Curtis style humour and
slightly, but not by much, original plot, The F Word/What If has proven to be a
sweet and charming flick for those lazy nights out.
Result: 7/10
Normally that would be the end, but I would also like to
briefly offer my condolences to family, friends and fans of actor and director
Richard Attenborough who passed away this week. Among an incredible career are
roles in the 1996 version of Hamlet named by many, including this site, as the
finest adaptation of Shakespeare in cinema. He also starred in The Great Escape
and Steven Spielberg’s stunning Jurassic Park. As well as this Attenborough directed
a number of successful films such as Chaplin, A Bridge too far and Ghandi,
winner of eight Academy Awards.
1923-2014
No comments:
Post a Comment