The true story of a New York entrepreneur whose sexual
appetite eventually leads to his downfall, wait a minute… no, it’s not directed
by Martin Scorsese and it’s not the Wolf of Wall Street. You do feel sorry for
this film, coming up against something so similar and with so much more credit.
I’m not saying this is automatically bad, but it’s main competitor had Leonardo
DiCaprio, Jonah Hill and at the helm was one of the greatest directors of the
last fifty years, in fact possibly of all time.
Anyway, as similar as it is this is not the Wolf of Wall
Street. So we can’t spend this revue simply stating how brilliant Martin
Scorsese is. Also because there is a considerable gap between the two film, and
the Wolf of Wall street is no longer in cinemas, I won’t compare the two films
against each other as if they’re actually competing because that just isn’t fair.
Like I said before, the film is based on a true story. It
follows the scandal involving Monetary Fund President Dominique Strauss-Kahn
and his arrest for sexual assault. Obviously the names have been changed, the
lead character is now called Devereaux but the film is already facing
self-censorship by the French Government, lawsuits from those portrayed in the
film, and reviews express complete disgust. Also, I don’t mean to spoil
anything but in this adaptation he is guilty. There’s no hint of ambiguity or
difference of opinion, it’s 100% fact that he committed the crimes that he is
charged with.
Also it certainly draws your attention to the fact that sex
is a large part of this film early on with quite an… interesting shall we say,
montage. Let me say then, although I previously promised not to compare this to
the Wolf of Wall Street, if you thought that was outrageous the prepare for
something in a completely different league with this. It’s main man Gerard
Depardieu gives a larger than life performance. It definitely is the jewel of
this otherwise chaotic film.
The plot doesn’t feel as clear and there doesn’t appear to
be any intelligent thought in it really. I mean, this is an issue that people
will have varied feelings about, whether it’s specifically about the case on
which the film is based on or the bigger picture behind this. Instead though it
decides not to trust the viewer’s intelligence and instead tells them exactly
what to think. I’m not saying that there’s nothing to condemn when it comes to
sexual assault (I could get some very angry comments if I did). But I am going
to go back to Martin Scorsese to prove my point, Goodfellas and Wolf of Wall
Street were based on proven crimes but they still allow the viewer to decide if
the ending is good. These people are now living average and normal but morally
right lives, is that a good thing. You decide. Welcome to New York portrays a
crime that was never proven, and also tells us what to think anyway.
Another thing, this film really feels like it wanted to cause
controversy. It went into cinemas looking for a fight, and now it’s found it in
the form of lawsuits and censorship. I really don’t know what to make of it, I am
completely stumped as to what to do. It’s rowdy and raunchy with no real sense
of direction or proven historical accuracy. I need help, if anyone has seen
this film and can think of a verdict of some sort please comment, and the best
argument will be our verdict.
Result: Um, do you know, we don’t/10
No comments:
Post a Comment