"A Coach is a father, a coach is a mentor, a coach has great power on an athlete's life."
If someone
had told me when I walked out of Anchorman 2 that in just over a year the guy
that played Brick, the mad, trident wielding, green screen misunderstanding,
weatherman, Steve Carell would be nominated for the academy award for best
supporting actor… well, why do you think I would’ve said. Actually, I probably
still would have said ‘He’s not getting nominated for his role as Brick?’
When Olympic
wrestler Mark Schultz (Channing Tatum) is hired by athletics enthusiast and billionaire
John du Pont (Carell) to lead a team to international glory it appears that he
has just grasped the chance of a lifetime. But when his brother (Mark Ruffalo)
becomes involved and du Pont’s behaviour becomes increasingly bizarre, his
opportunity shapes into a different life changing experience.
At the
centre of this film is a study of various psyches, like an educated billionaire
having the soul of a rabid animal or an experienced father having extreme
ideals or a young, strong man being impressionable and weak willed. Each
participant portrays this part perfectly, with Ruffalo, known for being the
most intelligent Avenger, becomes shockingly brutal and idealistic. He’s a man
who cannot express himself emotionally at all, in fact Dave Schultz is closer
to Bruce Banner’s alter ego than anything else.
Channing
Tatum is normally a glamorous dramatist or just a comedy actor, but here there
is nothing glamourous and certainly not comedic. Like his brother Mark clearly
struggles with emotional expression. But he is more aware of his situation, but
not at all in control of it. It’s a fascinating idea and Tatum never plays a
character with a clear sense of direction. Nor does he make this extravagant or
overly dramatic, his performance is stripped down to its raw core.
Steve Carell
must be going against ever instinct he has built up as an actor to play this
role. Under prosthetics he transforms completely, though there are slight
changes to his face I could still tell it was Carell. But his mental portrayal
of the character mask that more than any effects could, he brings this dark and
broiling man to life. With a schizophrenic personality that utilizes Carell’s comedic
and dramatic talents that can turn a humorous exterior into a horrifying soul.
It is truly exceptional.
Directorial restraint
plays a vital part in this story. Bennett Miller creates a bleak look to the
picture that succeeds in sucking out all of the overtones that could damage the
film. The whole theme of this story is dealing with the soul, taking away the
layers that people use to cover their inner dilemmas.
Perhaps if
there is a fault to find with Foxcatcher it’s that the dark and brooding look
of the film can subtract from the story slightly. Though it suits the film it
can’t help but make the film seem slow paced at times. It appears to be only a
slight problem in the final format of the film, but I can’t help but think that
the problem would be much worse with three less talented actors. The more I think
about it the more I have to admit that the screenplay would feel tedious
without the amazing talent and direction to support it.
It also
appears to have its priorities mislaid for who should have the main focus. Although
Carell is magnificent and never waivers and the film tries to explore his
motives, you feel more emotionally connected to Tatum. He’s the human centre of
the film compared to Carell’s remarkably inhuman character, so it might benefit
from substituting a few scenes du Pont for Schultz as it might add to the
emotional connection that, once again, without the stunning performances, I might
have lost completely.
Featuring
career best performances from Steve Carell and Channing Tatum (Mark Ruffalo is
only excluded because he already has many career defining roles, but this one
is equal to them as well), Foxcatcher is shockingly brutal and expertly shot,
spots drama of the highest order.
Result: 8/10
No comments:
Post a Comment