"Clear your minds, they already know what scares you."
If there’s one thing I hate its remakes that are
unnecessary. The original Poltergeist by Steven Spielberg (he probably directed
it okay, just look for some theories online and judge for yourself but in my
opinion, he did it) is a marvel of intimate and paranoid horror involving more
of a suburbia take on the usual horror tropes. The effects still hold up today
and the themes are still relevant today, and it’s not as if it’s impossible to
make a ghost story and not accused of ripping off Poltergeist, so why, please
tell me, why would you remake it now?
A family is plagued by evil forces that lurk within their
home. The attacks begin to escalate and eventually their youngest daughter is
taken captive, resulting in the rest of the family having to come together to
save her before she is lost forever.
The Psycho remake is regarded as one of the worst remakes of
all time, why, because there is no reason for it to exist. It’s a shot-for-shot
remake with nothing original innovative in sight. The same can be said for
Poltergeist. A child touches a TV, we get it you’re a remake but just do
something else instead of constantly trying to remind us of the original. You
need more than nostalgia to survive in this world. It takes imagination and
originality and some unique ideas to rise above the plot points and scares we’ve
seen before. The only difference is that here they are not executed as well as
they were in 1982. Whenever they do try to take a different approach it feels weird
and pointless, if you were going to change anything, why would you change that
tiny detail that makes no difference.
Actually that’s a lie. The other difference from the
original is a near total dependence on CGI. Nearly everything is digitally
enhanced in an effort to try and outdo its predecessor. But this remake never
does, instead the effects look fake and unbelievable. I don’t dislike CGI, in
fact I love it as long as I don’t know what is CGI ad what is real. Remember T2
and Jurassic Park, CGI heavy right, wrong, nearly half of those effects utilised
practical creations and this resulted in a far better visual experience.
Poltergeist just slaps the CGI on everything and it is very easy to separate the
real and fake, much like real ghost stories.
Furthermore, by asking your actors to imagine everything
that happens around them and not presenting them with anything to react against,
the result is only made worse by the fact that you can tell the actors are only
staring at a green screen, struggling to convey real emotions from their
position when faced with just some basic directing.
To be fair though, despite a rather lacklustre attitude and
reaction to the horror around them, the acting in the movie is credible. By far
Sam Rockwell is the best part of the film and if the rest of the film was
better we might even praise him as amazing. As well as that the rest of the
film is made in a proficient way. Don’t be mistaken, there’s nothing horrible
or terribly wrong about the film, but at the same time it does nothing at all
to stand out or make an impression and when you’re remaking a horror classic
like this then all you’re really doing is tarnishing the original.
As you can see with my list of top five best horror remakes
the best ones will always try something new, whether it be increased body
horror, faster pace, paranoia or introducing A-list talent in the production. But
here there’s nothing new on offer, and nothing that can scare me because I’ve
seen it all before.
Result: 3/10
No comments:
Post a Comment