"How willing ae you to die for your country? I'm ready to go right here, right now."
Donald Trump apparently likes this movie. Let me just get
that out of the way immediately because the political background of this movie
is a complex one, with many critics being accused of letting their personal
bias influence their verdict. I’m just letting you know now, because frankly
nothing seems to say more about this movie’s mind-set than the knowledge that
Trump likes it.
A recreation of the 2012 Benghazi incident in which a U.S
diplomatic compound in Libya was attacked by terrorists and the soldiers who
were sent in to deal with the occurrence.
Michael Bay has insisted that the film is not meant to be
seen as a political message or statement (no sh*t!), it is instead designed to
capture the incident on the ground level, not concerning itself with the
background or politics surrounding the issue, simply dealing with the soldier’s
experience of the event. Well I can safely say that such a description is in
fact an accurate one, as I went in knowing next to nothing about the Benghazi
incident and I came out knowing even less.
I’m still unsure as to whether that is an attribute or a
flaw. By not investing itself or concerning itself within the background of the
situation then it’s hard to empathise with anyone in the film. What precisely
are these soldiers fighting for? Yes I know its peace and security and so forth
but I mean specifically, in this incident of September 11th 2012,
what are they fighting for? But at the same time ’13 Hours’ never gives you a
thorough insight into the lives and motivations of these soldiers or their
enemies, the Libyan attackers are reduced to faceless aliens who must be
vanquished. You don’t need to justify their actions, no one can, but you could
give me some insight into why they felt attacking that outpost was necessary. Surely
they didn’t do it simply for the hell of it, or just because they needed to be
villains?
On the other hand though, if there is one thing Bay can’t do
with his films it is intelligent, dialogue driven scenes. Asking Bay to paint a
detailed portrait of a political scene is an exercise in futility, it’s like
asking someone to punch you in the face, why would you risk inciting such wrath
upon yourself? Also, to Bay’s credit, I think what he is trying to do here is to
put the audience in the place of these soldiers, we don’t know what is going on
at the moment, we are only aware that the situation at hand is one of life and
death. It is a chaotic and frantic to be dropped in, a lot like the experience
these men must have felt.
However, there is another war film that creates a similar
effect. It goes by the name of ‘Black Hawk Down’ and herein lies the problem,
for Michael Bay is not Ridley Scott. With that film Scott injected such a
gravitas to the story as it unfolded, the action was so visceral and downright
brutal that the audience can be almost overwhelmed by the warfare depicted in
the film. Bay’s film on the other hand has little sense of gravitas to it, it
simply seems like another display of noise and fury that ultimately signifies
nothing. Scott wanted to emphasise the lives that were lost that day, with ’13 Hours’
the main emphasis seems to be, “Look, explosions!”
Bay stylises the shootouts, firebombs, chases and explosions
in his usual way. There are instances of slow motion, low angle tracking shots
and a highly saturated colour scheme as well as rapid fire editing and
shaky-cam, none of which really rings true to the concept of visceral and
chaotic action. There is a minimal amount of characterisation and even that is
accomplished through the most conventional attempt at tear-jerking imaginable,
phone calls to home and staring longingly at family photos or passionately
telling their life stories to fellow soldiers. It doesn’t help that the movie lasts
for two hours and twenty two minutes, which is simply too long. Even if your
intention was to capture the chaos of a singular moment, you can’t keep blowing
stuff up for that long, that first hour in particular is rough to get through,
not because it’s challenging but because it is boring and uninteresting.
When Bay says ’13 Hours’ isn’t about politics, what he seems
to mean is that it isn’t about anything really, not the people, the background,
the aftermath or the loss of life, just the action.
Result: 4/10
No comments:
Post a Comment