"Private Doss, you are free to run into the hell fire of war without a single weapon to defend yourself."
Mel Gibson, is that it? Can we please leave now without any
further ado or awkward subjects? Well as I explained in my review of ‘Blood
Father’ Gibson’s personal life has no merit for me on how I judge his work,
that is unless it happens to be a film whose central thematic conceit is
grappling with some kind of complex concerning maintaining one’s faith in the
wake of a masculine image and violent, self-destructive environment. Good thing
‘Hacksaw Ridge’ won’t contain any of that, right?
Private Desmond Doss (Andrew Garfield) enlists in the army
but is immediately reduced to an outcast due to his refusal to carry a firearm
as part of his beliefs as a conscientious objector. When he finally reaches the
warzone at the Battle of Okinawa, despite not being armed with a single weapon,
his heroism and bravery would eventually make him the first objector to be
awarded the Medal of Honour.
I think it’s safe to say that as an actor and director Mel Gibson
is a unique talent, and the prospect of seeing him helm another project, particularly
one of this size and scale. In many ways ‘Hacksaw Ridge’ acts as the
culmination of Gibson’s career as a director thus far, which is not to say it
is his best effort. But in terms of a film that blends the visceral and unsettlingly
violent images of war we’ve witnessed in ‘Braveheart’ to the unapologetic
expression of faith in ‘The Passion of the Christ’, almost everything about
Gibson’s body of work and state of mind acts as an ideal counterpart to bring
this story to life. It is the purest representation of his own damaged psyche,
a deeply personal movie that is as much a personal confession as it is a story
of bravery.
But contrary to what one might expect, Gibson’s action
scenes are not always presented as a never ending splatter fest. As he
frequently switches to his characters emotions, pressing tightly to their own
realisation of the hell scape around them shortly before the audience are
treated to viewing what they are experiencing. When that moment comes it is unlike
anything I have witnessed in a war film since Spielberg’s ‘Saving Private Ryan’.
Though other directors like Ridley Scott or Kathryn Bigalow have been able to
capture the ferocious intensity or chaotic disorder, Gibson’s film unleashes a
vision of hell few filmmakers have replicated. It is violent and sadistic in
almost every regard yet also utterly engrossing in its presentation. The
carnage is difficult to accurately describe in words, as dismembered bodies
fly, explosions ring out with such ferociousness that it becomes a terrifying
scenario all on its own. Gibson’s eye for storytelling and flairmake it even
harder not to be dragged head first into the experience. The scenes of war are
both intimate and epic, but to call them stunning would be a lie, as violence
of this magnitude yet framed at such close-quarters is ill suited to such a description.
This doesn’t quite allow the film to escape the inevitable questions
concerning its hypocrisy. Should a film devoted to pacifism be so focussed upon
violence between men? It depends which aspect of Doss the film takes the most
pride in when describing him as heroic. Was he a hero because he saved lives,
because he refused to take lives, because he maintained his faith or simply
stood against adversary in all its forms? Ultimately that is up to you, and
while ‘Hacksaw Ridge’ does its best to leave interpretation as the key factor
over its purpose, it is hard not to notice the film tearing itself apart under
the strain of which direction it should take. Is its director more intrigued in
representing the sin than the salvation I wonder?
Luckily this is redeemed somewhat under another guise that
the film can take. The guise that it is a character study of Doss and not a
lesson in morality. If that is the case then I could easily accept it, due in
large part to Andrew Garfield’s truly terrific performance as Doss. As opposed
to a transient saint Doss is portrayed as a complex man with conflicting
emotions when it comes to his decisions. Garfield allows the character to
express more doubt and fear over his own self-righteousness than less confident
actors would allow. He tackles Doss’ motivations and ideologies but also the
ways in which he doubts himself even at the best of moments. Despite the
pre-action narrative feeling poorly paced and oddly structured at times,
Garfield and a strong holster of supporting actors such as Hugo Weaving, Sam
Worthington and Vince Vaughn each turning in their own fine performances to ensure
that it at least remains interesting. Despite being more of an expository
vehicle for the gargantuan achievement that is the second act, it works well enough
and ultimately is worth the price.
Like it’s director, ‘Hacksaw Ridge’ has its flaws and it
frequently at odds with itself, but its undeniable power, ferocity and sheer
strength of vision make it a bold and endearing effort.
Result: 8/10
No comments:
Post a Comment