"She will not stop, until she has remade this world in her image."
It is always risky to state your intentions to make an enormous
shared universe franchise before you have even released your latest movie. It
is a literal case of not getting too far ahead of yourself, but studios seem
intent on doing it time and time again. A prime example would be Sony who had
ambitious plans for a whole franchise but burned it to the ground with ‘The
Amazing Spider-Man 2’, co-written and produced by one Alex Kurtzman. What is
Kurtzman doing now you may ask? Well he’s writing and directing Universal’s ‘The
Mummy’.
Nick Morton (Tom Cruise) is a soldier of fortune who
plunders ancient sites for timeless artefacts and sells them to the highest
bidder. When Nick and his partner come under attack in the Middle East, the
ensuing battle accidentally unearths Ahmanet (Sofia Boutella), a betrayed
Egyptian princess who was entombed under the desert for thousands of years.
With her powers constantly evolving, Morton must now stop the resurrected
monster as she embarks on a furious rampage through the streets of London.
So as I was saying, Alex Kurtzman has already laid the founding
of one franchise that never happened. But unlike Sony, Universal seem even more
confident and sure of their future in this territory. When I saw ‘The Mummy’
the classic Universal logo lead straight into their ambitiously titled ‘Dark Universe’
title card. I must admit while I did not have any interest in a Mummy remake, I
was happy to see a Tom Cruise action movie that the trailers suggested ‘The
Mummy’ would be. However, this brings me back to Kurtzman who seems to have
made the exact same mistakes here as he did with ‘The Amazing Spider-Man 2’.
Not only does ‘The Mummy’ feel like a movie that panders
towards sequel baiting in the worst possible way, but before it even gets to
the point of franchise building it simply wasn’t that interesting to begin with
anyway. It succumbs to the generic supernatural tropes that have made the genre
loose favour with popular audiences while also lacking any sense of fun or
charm that might have made it more enjoyable. Apolgies in advance if I use the
words “generic” or “vague” throughout this review because there really is no
better way to describe every aspect of ‘The Mummy’.
Even the characters fit into that description perfectly from
their motivations to their personality and even their basic function. Having
sat through the whole movie I still don’t actually know what Tom Cruise’s job
is. Was he a soldier, treasure hunter, fugitive, archaeologist? His
understanding of ancient Egypt wildly fluctuates from apparently being able to
instantly recognise the era of a lost tomb he’s just stumbled into to not
knowing what Hieroglyphs are. It’s frankly baffling. But not nearly as baffling
as the titular Mummy’s vaguely defined supernatural powers. I can’t stress how
frustrating it is when you have an antagonist whose strengths and weaknesses go
completely undefined for the entire length of the movie.
All of this is a shame because Cruise and Boutella are two
engaging screen presence, particularly Boutella whose physical performance
feels like it belongs in a much better movie. But in a movie with such a flat
and uninteresting protagonist, coupled with an antagonist completely lacking in
a clear motivation or defined stakes, neither of them can redeem this. The rest
of the cast are fine, but once again none of the characters are engaging enough
to make me feel invested in the scenario of this movie, much less a whole
franchise load of sequels and crossovers.
Speaking of which, what drags the movie down even further is
that halfway through it is no longer a Mummy movie. It suddenly turns into
Chapter 1 of this ‘Dark Universe’ and now we’re left to deal with one
expositional scene after another that attempts to flesh out this universe only
for the conclusion to suddenly remember that the first movie is still going on
so we’d better have some rushed action scene. Worse still, nothing makes any of
it stand out at all. There’s no flashy dialogue, smart direction or engaging
moments. It just all blends together into an endless cycle of nothingness that
reminded me of two things. Firstly, I was reminded of how the MCU’s first movie
set the groundwork for a whole universe via a few Easter Eggs and one Samuel L
Jackson cameo which seems like an even more remarkable feat in light of this.
Secondly, I un-ironically miss Brendan Frasier.
Pandering to sequels that may never happen, uninterested in
its own mythology and too generic to be even remotely interesting.
Result: 3/10
No comments:
Post a Comment