"A hidden key, a leap not taken, retrace your steps, escape your past, and the hidden key will be yours at last."
I don’t think it’s any secret that the central conceit of
Ernest Cline’s ‘Ready Player One’ is pure wish fulfilment. Obviously that is
not to say that a ready cannot derive more meaning from it, but I think it
seems fairly obvious that Cline set out to incorporate the fantasies of his,
and an entire generation, or pop culture fans into an easily accessible story. It’s
that inherent aspect that could a movie adaptation intriguing or insufferable
depending upon how it’s handled.
In the year 2045, Wade Watts (Tye Sheridan) is among the
many who escape their harsh reality in the OASIS, an immersive virtual world
where you can go anywhere, do anything, be anyone-the only limits are your own
imagination. OASIS creator James Halliday (Mark Rylance) left his immense
fortune and control of the Oasis to the winner of a contest designed to find a
worthy heir. Soon Wade is hurled into a fantastical universe of discovery and
danger to save the OASIS and their world.
I feel that if anyone can instil more meaning into a book
that, if I’m being brutally honest, I found somewhat empty and indulgent, it’s
Steven Spielberg. In some regards the seasoned director does wring a good deal
more substance out of the source material but in others the film still falls
short. Spielberg does a good job at stripping away many of the pop culture
references in favour of zeroing in on the driving force of the narrative and
characters. The result is an adaptation that actually builds upon the themes of
its story. Though it still leaves something to be desired there’s no mistaking
Spielberg’s particular craftsmanship in his handling of the story.
It’s also the most Spielbergian (that’s a word right?) movie
the director has made since ‘Minority Report’. There’s a brilliant kinetic
energy that permeates every action sequence to make them utterly electrifying.
Spielberg also showcases once more that he has a better understanding of a
scene’s geography and its importance more than almost anyone else. Every
exciting set piece is concise and clear without losing any of its visceral
thrill. His favouring of long, smooth takes over unnecessary fast edits gives
makes the action flow seamlessly as well.
Another remarkable aspect is how the world of the OASIS is
rendered. Though I wouldn’t call the special effects realistic necessarily,
they do have a visual consistency that endows a certain believability to the
world. The way in which the camera navigates the world never fails to evoke a
sense of awe as it unfolds in front of the audience. It paints an astonishingly
cinematic portrait that possesses a terrific depth of field thanks to the
cinematography of Janusz Kaminski. The scope allows Spielberg to include many
of the pop culture references in the background. But at the same time the frame
rarely feels cluttered or overly dense.
The characters that inhabit that world are all brought to
life superbly by the talented cast. Ben Mendelson makes for a wonderfully
maniacal villain while Mark Rylance serves as the Willy Wonka of the OASIS
which he conveys with a sense of wonder and indelible charm. Tye Sheridan and
Olivia Cooke make for compelling protagonists as well. Though if I may take
this time to make a very minor nitpick (more with the industry as a whole than
this movie), can movies stop trying to objectively attractive people out to be
hideous? Olivia Cooke’s character has a barely noticeable birthmark on her
face, which the film treats as if that makes her a freak of nature when by all
intents and purposes she is still ridiculously beautiful. I’m just saying.
Another, significantly larger issue, comes from the
development and depth that is bestowed to each of these characters. Though they
are established well, ‘Ready Player One’ never really digs into its characters
or what motivates them. Normally that might not be a significant issue but in a
film that is literally constructed around the concept of people redefining
their identities it surely wouldn’t hurt to uncover at least a bit about what
exactly led those people to adopt their specific identities. Furthermore, the
characters don’t develop as much as they do fill an obligation to the script.
Though they undergo changes they seem to come about suddenly and when it’s convenient
for the narrative rather than a more substantial way of conveying their
progression.
I wouldn’t say the lack of depth is detrimental to ‘Ready
Player One’ but it’s the reason it ultimately ends up being a middle tier
Spielberg entry. There’s enough energy and pulpy joy to it, with the plot being
fast paced and highly enjoyable. But it lacks that little extra something that
would elevate it to stand alongside Spielberg’s stronger catalogue. That being
said, middle tier Spielberg is still stronger than the work of most other
filmmakers so you could do significantly worse when it comes to high concept
blockbusters.
Highly entertaining and supremely energetic, ‘Ready Player
One’ is a movie elevated by Spielberg’s deft touch, even if could stand to be
elevated a little further.
fandango - I personally did not read the book prior to watching this movie. I did not go into the theater with preconceived ideas or expectations. With that being said, I was not disappointed at all. Most of the negative reviews this movie is getting is from raging nerds who say it's not as good as the book (are they ever)?) This is a great and entertaining movie, I absolutely recommend ignoring the raging nerds and go watch it.
ReplyDeleteSee more:
deadpool full movie
watch hostiles online free
watch age of adaline online free
ex machina putlockers